[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] facing a dilemma
My trouble as a writing teacher in this situation is that the terrorist attack presents both the best and worst possible topic in my curriculum. I am teaching 102 this semester, with my curriculum focusing on argument, public discourse and one's own hometown. We are starting our second major project of the semester, which involves the collection and rhetorical analysis of editorials, columns, and letters to the editor on a particular issue that appears in their hometown newspapers, which most of them read online. Around half of my students' hometowns are in the DC metropolitan area, and many of them had friends and relatives who work at the pentagon. Many others are from the area surrounding the Norfolk naval base. While last semester this project led to a wide variety of topics for my students, this semester the terrorist attacks and the resulting opinions about what to do dominate the Virginia newspapers. I decided to tell them that if they could find enough editorials on other topics to make the project doable, they could use them, but frankly, at the moment other topics are hard to find. In short, I'm finding it very difficult not to use what is happening in my class, given my already existing curriculum. I understand the reasons people are giving for not asking students to write about what has happened, and I agree with many of those reasons. So I feel caught in a dilemma. laurie -- Laurie Cubbison Assistant Professor Of English Radford University
|